CHA ÀÇ°úÇдëÇб³ Â÷º´¿ø professor

±³¼ö´Ô»çÁø
  • °í¿øÁø
  • ¼ÒÈ­±â³»°ú ±³¼ö
  • ¼Ò ¼Ó: Â÷ÀÇ°úÇдëÇб³ºÎ¼Ó±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø
  • Àü¹®ºÐ¾ß : À§ÀåÁúȯ, ¼ÒÈ­±â¾Ï, Ä¡·á³»½Ã°æ
  • Á÷ À§: ¼ÒÈ­±â³»°ú ±³¼ö
  • ¸Þ ÀÏ: wisred@naver.com
  • Àü È­: 054)450-9700
  • ÆÑ ½º:
  • ÁÖ ¼Ò: °æºÏ ±¸¹Ì½Ã ½Å½Ã·Î 10±æ 12
  • ȨÆäÀÌÁö:
  • ·Î±×ÀÎ

ÅǸ޴º

ÁÖ¿ä¹ßÇ¥³í¹®

ÁÖ¿ä¹ßÇ¥³í¹®
Á¦¸ñ Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study µî·ÏÀÏ 20180313 ´Ù¿î·Îµå   
Background and study aims The variables associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are largely unknown. This study aimed to: 1) identify the prevalence of reflux esophagitis and asymptomatic GER in patients who underwent POEM, and 2) evaluate patient and intraprocedural variables associated with post-POEM GER. Patients and methods All patients who underwent POEM and subsequent objective testing for GER (pH study with or without upper gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy) at seven tertiary academic centers (one Asian, two US, four European) were included. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) DeMeester score ¡Ã 14.72 (cases) and 2) DeMeester score of < 14.72 (controls). Asymptomatic GER was defined as a patient with a DeMeester score ¡Ã 14.72 who was not consuming proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Results A total of 282 patients (female 48.2 %, Caucasian 84.8 %; mean body mass index 24.1 kg/m2) were included. Clinical success was achieved in 94.3 % of patients. GER evaluation was completed after a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range 10 - 24 months). A DeMeester score of ¡Ã 14.72 was seen in 57.8 % of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed female sex to be the only independent association (odds ratio 1.69, 95 % confidence interval 1.04 - 2.74) with post-POEM GER. No intraprocedural variables were associated with GER. Upper GI endoscopy was available in 233 patients, 54 (23.2 %) of whom were noted to have reflux esophagitis (majority Los Angeles Grade A or B). GER was asymptomatic in 60.1 %. Conclusion Post-POEM GER was seen in the majority of patients. No intraprocedural variables were identified to allow for potential alteration in procedural technique.

¸ñ·Ïº¸±â ¼öÁ¤ »èÁ¦

Copyright ¨Ï chamc, All rights reserved.

ºü¸£°í Æí¸®ÇÑ ÀÎÅÍ³Ý Áø·á¿¹¾à

  • °­³²Â÷º´¿ø
  • ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø
  • ºÐ´çÂ÷¿©¼ºº´¿ø
  • ±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø
  • ¿©¼ºÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
  • Â÷¿ò

ÀüÈ­¹®ÀÇ

  • °­³²Â÷º´¿ø 02.3468.3000
  • ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø 031.780.5000
  • Â÷¿ò 02.3015.5300
  • ±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø 054.450.9700
  • ´ë±¸¿©¼ºÂ÷º´¿ø 02.222.4200
  • °­³²°ÇÁø¼¾ÅÍ 02.2191.3900
  • ºÐ´çÁ¾ÇÕ°Ç°­ÁõÁø¼¾ÅÍ 031.780.5940
  • ½ºÆ÷·º½º °ÇÁø¼¾ÅÍ 02.3473.2111
  • ±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø°ÇÁø¼¾ÅÍ 054.450.9800
  • ȨÆäÀÌÁö°ü¸®ÀÚ 031.780.1729