CHA ÀÇ°úÇдëÇб³ Â÷º´¿ø professor

±³¼ö´Ô»çÁø
  • ±èÀçÈ­
  • ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿øÀå
  • ¼Ò ¼Ó: ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø
  • Àü¹®ºÐ¾ß : °ß°üÀý/½½°üÀý
  • Á÷ À§: ±³¼ö(ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿øÀå)
  • ¸Þ ÀÏ: ºñ°ø°³
  • Àü È­: 1577-4488
  • ÆÑ ½º:
  • ÁÖ ¼Ò: °æ±âµµ ¼º³²½Ã ºÐ´ç±¸ ¾ßž·Î 59
  • ȨÆäÀÌÁö:
  • ·Î±×ÀÎ

ÅǸ޴º

ÁÖ¿ä¹ßÇ¥³í¹®

ÁÖ¿ä¹ßÇ¥³í¹®
Á¦¸ñ ´ç´¢ Á· ȯÀÚ°£¿¡ ÁßÁ· Á·Áö °üÀý °æ»ç°¢ÀÇ ºñ±³ µî·ÏÀÏ 20150401 ´Ù¿î·Îµå   
´ëÇÑÁ·ºÎÁ·°üÀýÇÐȸÁö
¹ßÇàÁ¤º¸ Year : 2002, Volume : 6, Number : 2, page : 139 ~ 142  

Purpose : We analyzed the Metatarso-Phalangeal Oblique Angle(MPOA) of Diabetic foot.
Materials and methods : We studied retrospectively 60 cases of diabetic foot in 52 patients, fot the evaluation of the correlations between clinical outcomes and radiologic findings in the conservative management group (Group A; 36 cases) and the major operation group (Group B; 24 cases). We measured MPOA on AP view. The MPOA was defined as the intersection angle of the Metatarso-Phalangeal Break Line (a line passing from the second to fifth metatarsal heads) and the long aixs of foot in sagittal plane. We performed the statistical analysis between MPOA and clinical outcomes by independent t-test.
Results : The mean of MPOA in group B, 70.79¡Æ(range: 62.8¡Æ-81.3¡Æ), was significantly higher than that in group A, 68.04¡Æ(range: 62.0¡Æ-71.5¡Æ), was significantly higher than that in patients of hind foot lesions(30 cases), 66.97¡Æ(range: 62.8¡Æ-81.3¡Æ).
Conclusions : We recognizes the MPOA might be useful simple parameter in assessing the diabetic foot.

¸ñ·Ïº¸±â ¼öÁ¤ »èÁ¦

Copyright ¨Ï chamc, All rights reserved.

ºü¸£°í Æí¸®ÇÑ ÀÎÅÍ³Ý Áø·á¿¹¾à

  • °­³²Â÷º´¿ø
  • ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø
  • ºÐ´çÂ÷¿©¼ºº´¿ø
  • ±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø
  • ¿©¼ºÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
  • Â÷¿ò

ÀüÈ­¹®ÀÇ

  • °­³²Â÷º´¿ø 02.3468.3000
  • ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø 031.780.5000
  • Â÷¿ò 02.3015.5300
  • ±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø 054.450.9700
  • ´ë±¸¿©¼ºÂ÷º´¿ø 02.222.4200
  • °­³²°ÇÁø¼¾ÅÍ 02.2191.3900
  • ºÐ´çÁ¾ÇÕ°Ç°­ÁõÁø¼¾ÅÍ 031.780.5940
  • ½ºÆ÷·º½º °ÇÁø¼¾ÅÍ 02.3473.2111
  • ±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø°ÇÁø¼¾ÅÍ 054.450.9800
  • ȨÆäÀÌÁö°ü¸®ÀÚ 031.780.1729